tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5837649262664920887.post5925730423412907195..comments2023-10-07T04:11:13.118-07:00Comments on Eagle Dawg Blog: Hidden in the Bookshelf: PubMed & Discovery InitiativeNikki Dettmarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04776347841601797513noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5837649262664920887.post-54229560476968613342009-02-06T10:50:00.000-08:002009-02-06T10:50:00.000-08:00I can understand NLM's frustration with receiving ...I can understand NLM's frustration with receiving feedback about PubMed in chunks of 140 characters or less. There is not much room for context or constructive suggestions in a tweet. As you said before, though, #pubmed (like MEDLIB-L, but more on the fly) does give librarians the chance to read others' feedback about PubMed. We are more likely to come up with constructive suggestions as a community.<BR/><BR/>What I would like from NCBI is more transparency about their web development and usability testing processes. Why this method of pushing features out to some users, some of the time? <BR/><BR/><I>To help with this effort NCBI is also designing Web interfaces and links so that the effectiveness and popularity of these changes can be measured and studied.</I><BR/><BR/>What does this mean?Alison Aldrichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03883637762449201255noreply@blogger.com