About Me

I'm a 28+ year academic health sciences career chimera whose views in no way represent the institution.

Friday, July 24, 2026

Racism still leads to health disparities

Celebrate this! Close to 500K comments on federal register notice for Federal Funding Rule Change, proposed federal rule (OMB-2026-0034). These comments can and probably will be used in litigation in the future. Thank you, thank you, thank you to everyone who left a comment.

[image or embed]

— Fired but Fighting (National Public Health Coalition) (@firedbutfighting.bsky.social) July 15, 2026 at 2:08 PM

 

It's been quiet over here, but I did want to draw attention to the fact that NIH is again terminating grants that the Trump administration dislikes. In addition, Trump administration has quietly throttled an agency devoted to the safety of American healthcare.

This situation is exactly why I'm one of those almost 500K comments on OMB-2026-0034-0001

Thursday, February 12, 2026

Racial Justice Competencies: Guiding Points to Action

You can't unpost racism. Bernice A. King from https://x.com/BerniceKing/status/2019876787115679912

During Black history month, Trump's racist post about Obamas is deleted after backlash despite White House earlier defending it.

Systemic and structural racism are real regardless of what last year's Dear Colleague letter said. (2/18 update - Department of Education Backs Down on Unlawful Directive Targeting Educational EquitySigns referencing slavery, climate change, and Native American history have been removed from at least 17 national park sites in six states, (2/17 update - Citing Orwell’s ‘1984,’ judge orders Trump administration to return slavery exhibits removed from Philadelphia museum)  

Sanitizing history betrays the courageous survivors of American brutality and racism.

On a related note, my public health colleagues & I have plenty to say about racism and taking action against it in our freely available (real peer reviewed) article at DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002325. While we wrote for public health practitioners in a public health journal, the information is applicable to everyone. At the core are racial justice competencies which were worked on for years with guidance & suggested revisions from a thoughtful expert review panel, then pilot tested with public health organizations across the United States. 

Competencies are a structured way to assess and understand our learning. These competencies are arranged from introductory to intermediate to leading, with a goal of embedding racial justice in all areas of work. We all have room to grow in racial justice, especially as individuals when organizational priorities have recently shifted.  

What does that look like? Here's how-

  1. Introductory - Share resources, approaches, and tools on structural racism, racial justice, and health equity work.
  2. Intermediate -  Advocate for health equity, social, and environmental justice (e.g. sharing power, educating public and policymakers, and influencing funding).
  3. Leading - Critique structural and systemic racism embedded within public systems, policies, and practices to advance health equity. 

I'm here to share the importance of lifelong learning, and encourage all to get rolling with the call to action at the end.  


Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Public health -- Periodicals: Question Authority Records

 

black and white image of the top half of a skeleton stuck inside a pitcher plant
Hanging in there for a new year

A quick question for library folks: Do you have the Journal of the Academy of Public Health* in your catalog? 

It may come as a surprise to find that it's in there & you may want to reconsider that listing. 

The cautionary February 2025 New journal co-founded by NIH nominee raises eyebrows, misinformation fears from Science is valid. The journal currently contains 2 literature syntheses articles, labeled as open peer review, that contain political and ideological language (and additional indicators for further evaluation, see below) in their titles & content.

That's fine for editorial & opinion articles, but not in the peer reviewed research literature synthesis articles that our users frequently are searching for & citing in their own research. 

For a 2026 evaluating information guide update, I wrote about health information with attribution to our Canadian neighbours' excellent 6 signs a source is unreliable for when trusted health sources are starting to feel off from ScienceUpFirst

Six indicators for further evaluation include

    • Selective or misleading use of studies or data.
    • Use of political or ideological language.
    • Ignores credible scientific criticisms and article corrections.
    • Breaks from broad peer-reviewed expert consensus.
    • Asks for impossible or double negative proofs.
    • Constant messaging changes.

If in doubt, look to see what other trusted health information organizations are saying about the same information before sharing it.

I'm refreshing my own teaching to be even more clear about what evidence-based information is & who trusted health information organizations are in this year ahead!  

* I don't want to send them any click traffic which is why I'm not directly linking to the journal website. Archive.org hasn't picked up the 2 articles yet to link to them either.

Sunday, November 23, 2025

Alternative Access Resources & Clear Communication

 

Poster with C-3PO and R2D2 that says PARENTS OF EARTH, ARE YOUR CHILDREN FULLY IMMUNIZED? MAKE SURE-CALLYOUR DOCTOR OR HEALTH DEPARTMENT TODAY. AND MAY THE FORGE BE WITH YOU.
1977 CDC vaccination campaign poster

On Thursday night I signal boosted that CDC scientists aren't in control of public-facing websites ahead of the Friday news that RFK Jr. says he personally directed CDC's new guidance on vaccines and autism. My heart goes out to the 5 staffers contributing to "Embarrassing" and "Horrifying": CDC Workers Describe the New Vaccines and Autism Page. It's also worth reading the opinion of We are former CDC officials. RFK Jr.s change to vaccine guidance is propaganda. Personally, I prefer almost 50-year-old Star Wars CDC information about vaccines instead of this current malarky. 

I've been saying this since August; Can we in good faith still promote US government-produced health resources as the "best available information"?  Since September the warning signals were clear as everyone from the former Surgeons General to the World Health Organization were calling for CDC's protection, and now here we are. 

I also promised to share more about my Pacific Northwest Chapter of the Medical Library Association November 6 presentation (I requested no recording). Back then I didn't know if I'd still be employed after January 15th (I'm now employed until July 15th), and I made it clear that I was speaking not as a representative of any of my former or current job positions/organizations, but 100% as the obnoxious smartass opinionated straight talker I am.  

The truth is I've already shared most of what I said there over here for months, just distilled it into 10 minutes of tips & tools. I'll batch this entry together the same way I did then though, and there are a few updates along the way along with 2 clear public health communication resources to counter last week's 'guidance.'

Alternative Access Resources

My guess is most of you already know and use these resources by now. In my presentation I included my teaching language, why we need to keep centering populations who are missing from resources now, and an emphasis on shifting gears from national .govs directly to trusted local, tribal, county/state health and professional organizations for health information. 

Archive.org - for snapshots of websites over time, pop a URL in and see what info it used to have

MedlinePlus Population Groups (I had a lot to say about this in June)

NNLM Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Guide - gone but not forgotten

Another Way - thanks Erika! 

Alternative Access Resources - non-partisan entry points

Think Topically - need suggestions on the trusted organizations? Here's some to start from

PubMed? (the what-ifs in June & continuing in September, getting real needs to start now

Clear Communication

I have learned so much from 5 years of public health workforce training development work, especially these really valuable communication resources that are focused on current trending and/or hot health topics.

Librarians and public health communicators have identical goals: Communicating clearly about unbiased health information in plain language. Please consider referencing them frequently now & in the time ahead - they will not deviate from real science and evidence-based resources.

Public Health Communications Collaborative 

 Infodemiology 

 FrameWorks 


Thursday, November 20, 2025

CDC: "And we persist, goddammit"

Hard day today Here's what we think about trusting CDC

[image or embed]

— Alt CDC (they/them) (@altcdc.altgov.info) November 20, 2025 at 5:24 PM 

tl;dr bullet points, bold my own emphasis  

  • Bluesky's verified #AltGov labeler/#AltGov starter pack is helpful alternative communication.
  • More about that in my October 12 post
  • CDC's scientists aren't in control of public-facing CDC websites.
  • "Don't treat them [CDC websites] as the gold standard" 
  • "Corroborate the information with other trusted, independent sources"
  • CDC's scientists are still there and still sciencing.
  • Exhibit A MMWR November 20, 2025 / 74(37);580–588 (legit science!) 
  • Exhibit B MMWR November 20, 2025 / 74(37);589–591 (also legit science!)

  • Vaccines do not cause autism


    "Other trusted, independent sources": Can't go wrong with the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia! 

    The agency this week quietly changed its official language to suggest vaccines may cause autism, a claim that scientists say has no basis in evidence

    [image or embed]

    — Scientific American (@sciam.bsky.social) November 20, 2025 at 8:21 AM

    Gender-affirming care improves mental health and saves lives


    HHS leaders are doubling down on harm. Their new “report” on gender-affirming care for minors is junk science. Skip it. Check this out instead: sph.washington.edu/news-events/... It links to real evidence-based research Bottom line: Gender-affirming care improves mental health and saves lives 🏳️‍⚧️🫢🏳️‍⚧️

    [image or embed]

    — Alt CDC (they/them) (@altcdc.altgov.info) November 20, 2025 at 2:37 PM

    Upstream Opportunities: Alternative Access Resources & Clear Communication

    More next week about other trusted, independent sources and communication strategies. If you were there when I opened my mouth on November 6 and did not script any of what flew out of it, you can skip it because you already know what I had to say and got a handout with all my sources. 

    Sunday, October 26, 2025

    SNAP Back Against Hunger

     

    Fall vegetarian potluck scene at work last week

    Since Food benefits set to expire for 41 million people as US shutdown continues, take action - 

    Sunday, October 12, 2025

    CDC: No library, dangerous data, bad actor

    Now, federal health agencies, universities, health systems and the communities we serve are in peril. We must ask ourselves: are we willing to address the power structures that jeopardize public health and produce health inequities?*

    Edit: slight update, still caution

    Small win: #CDC privacy office survived the weekend chaos. Big concerns remain about how HHS, Palantir & others may use STLT data. If agencies must share, we recommend the bare minimum—aggregate if possible—and use high caution and good judgement to protect residents against unsanctioned data use.

    [image or embed]

    — Alt CDC (they/them) (@altcdc.altgov.info) October 13, 2025 at 9:01 AM

    tl;dr bullet points - 

    I'm not sure any of us can keep up with the rapid pace of changes since Friday night when Trump Administration Lays Off Dozens of C.D.C Officials (gift link), then CDC walks back hundreds of firings as US shutdown persists.

    The latter article indicates CDC library firing was not reversed, which aligns with information on Friday from the @AltCDC account on Blusky

    RIFed: Office of Science - CDC Library They have helped SO many of us with their expertise & guidance so we can do efficient & quick research. You don’t need us toiling in Pubmed for days at a time during an outbreak. The library helps us get what we need quickly so we can continue our work.

    [image or embed]

    — Alt CDC (they/them) (@altcdc.altgov.info) October 10, 2025 at 7:01 PM

    This was pinned as a top notice on their account today (Sunday): 

    ⚠️ STATES, LOCALS, TRIBAL NATIONS, TERRITORIES ⚠️ HHS has eliminated EVERY SINGLE SAFEGUARD FOR DATA PROTECTION AT CDC. Giving data to CDC is no longer safe and puts your residents at risk. Unless and until all CDC’s data protections are restored you should consider CDC a bad actor.

    — Alt CDC (they/them) (@altcdc.altgov.info) October 12, 2025 at 10:03 AM

    Click through to see the thread for specifics, such as a recommendation to keep protected health information (PHI) to local levels and reporting data summaries.

    I understand if you are skeptical about an individual account on Blusky serving as a legitimate alternative communication channel for information.

    What is not visible via an embed is this verified #altgov badge between the account and message though: 

    AltCDC (they/them) @altcdc.altgov.info, verified #altgov


     



    The Verified #AltGov labeler of the #AltGov starter pack (vetted & verified accounts, more about the #AltGov accounts) is one I highly recommend if you are on Blusky. So many dedicated workers from within/adjacent to the federal government are doing their best to keep communicating with the public even as their official communication channels are maligned or terminated, and it's on us to seek out & amplify their message. I really hope I can include a future edit above my tl;dr line here that CDC data safeguards are in place again, but documenting where things are at in this point in time is necessary.

    In solidarity with really awesome public health colleagues asking us to address power structures, again I ask: Can we in good faith still promote US government-produced health resources as the "best available information"? 

    *https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-7085 Caitlin L. McMurtry et al. “Why Building Power Is Key to Protecting Academic Public Health and Advancing Health Equity”, American Journal of Public Health 115, no. 11 (November 1, 2025): pp. 1783-1788. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308210 PMID: 41061214


    Sunday, September 21, 2025

    MEDLINE: From Committee to Consultants

    As I shared on June 16, I've been concerned about the PubMed database of biomedical and life sciences literature this year. I didn't explicitly say MEDLINE, the primary indexed biomedical sciences component of PubMed, but perhaps I should have. 

    There was a Technical Bulletin on September 8 about MEDLINE selection that I followed to learn more, and saw that the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (LSTRC, a National Library of Medicine advisory committee since 1987) was terminated this year.  

    Here's what was there on July 25 for the Journal Selection for MEDLINE.

    I underlined below who made the final decision about MEDLINE journal indexing: 

     ... as well as the recommendations of an NIH Federal Advisory Committee, the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee (LSTRC).

    The LSTRC consists of fifteen members, including scientists (i.e., Ph.D.- or M.D.-level researchers and physicians) and medical librarians. The LSTRC generally reviews articles from the last two years of journal content and evaluates them primarily based on scientific and editorial quality.

    MEDLINE’s Scientific Quality Review is a rigorous, multi-step process in which many factors are assessed. NLM views each journal comprehensively, rather than basing a decision on a defined list of criteria. Each title is reviewed by multiple individuals both within the NLM and the LSTRC, and final decisions are based on input from all these sources. The final decision of whether to index a journal for MEDLINE is made by the Director of the NLM.  

    Here's what's the Journal Selection for MEDLINE description is now (September 21). I underlined some observed differences where LSTRC-related information used to be in the July 25 version. 

    It is now not stated exactly who makes the final decision about MEDLINE journal indexing, and the consultants' recommendations line is new:

    ...as well as the recommendations of external, expert consultants

    At least two consultants, usually one scientist (i.e., doctoral-level researchers or physicians) and one medical librarian review each journal. The consultants generally review articles from the last two years of journal content and evaluate them primarily based on scientific and editorial quality. Their recommendations are taken into consideration by NLM in reaching a final decision on selecting a title for inclusion in MEDLINE.

    MEDLINE’s Scientific Quality Review is a rigorous, multi-step process in which many factors are assessed. NLM views each journal comprehensively, rather than basing a decision on a defined list of criteria. Each title is reviewed by multiple individuals both internal and external to NLM, and final decisions are based on input from all these sources.

    Some additional concerns about publishing the past few days include news headlines of


    There are still spaces available to register for the English update on September 25 at 9:00 am Pacific time of the European OLSPub project, an alternative to PubMed that I'd encourage medical librarians to check out. 

    *Chermak, S., Demichele, M., Gruenewald, J., Jensen, M., Lewis, R., & Lopez, B. E. (2024). What NIJ research tells us about domestic terrorism. National Institute of Justice. 
    https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/what-nij-research-tells-us-about-domestic-terrorism [with Internet Archive link to content]

    Tuesday, September 9, 2025

    Public health: "It’s truly a matter of life and death"

     

    Faculty lead & program manager a lifetime ago (January 2020)

    I often describe November 2019 - January 2024 as 'I worked for the School of Public Health for 5 years then came back to the Health Sciences Library as their librarian,' but that summary can never do justice to that time & certainly not to my phenomenal colleagues. 

    We did amazing work. I can't remember what was so funny on this day when we launched it. We certainly had no idea what was about to happen to everyday life as we knew it. We kept the program going throughout 2020 & 2021 in a virtual pivot, then in hybrid yearly cohorts supportive of where our scholars were at & improving to the best of our ability and resources based on evaluation feedback. 

    Our faculty lead back then is now our State Health Officer (previously Chief Science Officer) who signed a standing order for all of Washington, in break with FDA rules, acts to assure wide access to COVID-19 vaccines last week. He notes, "COVID-19 vaccines are well-researched, well-tested, and have saved millions of lives around the world." 

    That resulted in his national time with Rachel Maddow Tuesday! We are so lucky to have him & the rest of our solidly scientific evidence-based team at the helm of our state's department of health, and on Thursday our insurance announced their COVID-19 vaccine coverage at no cost too.

    Last week also had the Surgeons general warning: CDC saves lives. It's up to us to save public health that included this blog post title. 

    They caution "As former surgeons general, we took an oath to protect the health of the American people. This includes speaking out when the public’s health is in danger ‒ even when doing so is uncomfortable or politically charged. We see that danger now in the current turmoil at the CDC. We call on the American people to recognize the stakes. The CDC’s work is foundational to our health security, and without a stable, expert-led agency, we are vulnerable.

    We urge all Americans to contact their elected representatives and demand that they prioritize the stability and competence of the CDC."

    Even the World Health Organization says US CDC needs to be protected

    I'm still thinking about what the best strategy is to protect public health as I revisit all the federal .gov health information sources links we have. Some are fine, some are gone, some are looking rather questionable. 

    Friday, August 29, 2025

    Protect Public Health

    I keep meaning to blog over the weekends but can't keep up with the magnitude of things spiraling since the August 8 assault was an attack on CDC and on violence prevention, so here's yesterday alone since the article headlines say it all and present a range of perspectives within them.

    As a medical librarian, I'm revisiting our Code of Ethics that hasn't been updated for 15 years (seriously?) and thinking we need to have some conversations about that. Can we in good faith still promote US government-produced health resources as the "best available information"? 

    Potential action item: Read then Sign the Letter - Save HHS

    Yesterday (August 28)- 

     

    Monday, June 23, 2025

    Bias by exclusion: MedlinePlus & more

     

    Me alongside a National Library of Medicine exhibit panel, MedlinePlus brochures on the table, in Billings MT 2007

    Last week Matthew Noe shared an update (alt text available on clickthrough) - 

    Sharing this update provided to me directly about the state of NLM and the future of NNLM, traveling exhibits, and, somehow, MedlinePlus. I am so worried for friends and colleagues, and I'm stuck on that, but it is hard to not want to scream WTF about a MedlinePlus with no new material. #medlibs

    [image or embed]

    — Matthew Noe πŸ”œ #ALAAC25 (@noethematt.bsky.social) June 18, 2025 at 5:36 AM

    There is much concern about these potential directions of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) and the Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM). Following up from last week's post, there's still no sign of FY25 funding for NNLM (source) which should have begun on May 1 (6/30 edit to add: I published this blog entry at 6 am Pacific time June 23; I note FY25 NNLM NOA (Notice of Award) dated June 23 have been posted for many but not all NNLM). It's heartening to see Outside groups organize to form unbiased, independent vaccine panel

    Speaking of bias, I had been both using & recommending MedlinePlus.gov as a source of 'trusted health information for you' in plain language since I was an NNLM intern in 2007.

    I don't anymore as MedlinePlus and other federal health information resources contain bias by exclusion for American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans, Black and African Americans, Latino and Hispanic Americans, LGBTQIA+, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders with the 2025 administration change. 

    This is my federal health information resources teaching strategy that I've been using with students, researchers & faculty for when a website no longer works or now seems to have less inclusive information since Federal DEI websites go dark after Trump order and threat of 'consequences

    1. Look at the current information (a MedlinePlus example, Population Groups).  
    2. Look at the previous information using archive.org (Population Groups on January 14, 2025).
    3. Who/what is included there now? 
    4. Who/what was included there but is now excluded? 
    5. Why is that? 
    American Indians and Alaska Natives have been here since time immemorial - 
    Why is that? There is no apparent reason, and -
    Why is that when at a glance they may look the same?

    Look deeper; the first section is unchanged, strikethroughs were January 18, 2025 wording, + are current changes:

    This profile offers an overview of the social, economic, and environmental factors that shape the health of the American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) population in the United States. Considering the unique environments, cultures, histories, and circumstances of AI/AN populations is fundamental to improving their health outcomes and reducing
    longstanding disparities. These factors, known as social determinants of health (SDOH), affect various health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks. Non-medical factors like poverty, limited access to healthcare, and lack of education are all examples of individual SDOH that contribute to health disparities. + Factors such as education, income, and health insurance coverage, which are examples of non-medical drivers to health, can affect various health, function, and quality-of-life outcomes and contribute to disparities in health outcomes.

    Visit Healthy People 2030 to learn more about SDOH 

    Why is that when social determinants of health (SDOH) at Healthy People 2030 from the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) under HHS still exists? Shouldn't SDOH be more prominent for American Indian and Alaska Native health given last week's study showing Official US records underestimate Native American deaths and life expectancy?

    There is no apparent reason, but look deeper; racism has been removed as a current SDOH example and discrimination has been excluded from current SDOH literature summaries.  

    Be intentional with your health information seeking. Question any lack of inclusivity within it. Racism and discrimination exist and have real impacts on health. Excluding diverse population groups and certain words from federal health information resources does not mean health equity has been achieved.   

    I'm not stopping my efforts towards working for the health for all people and I encourage you to do the same. 


    Monday, June 16, 2025

    Resist: 5 months back after 5 years away

    The author holding a protest sign of 'No Research, NO CURES #KillTheCuts' alongside another protester with a 'Kill the cuts, save lives' sign


    *gently blows 9+ years of digital dust off blogging*

    Today marks 5 months since my return to the health information field as a public health librarian after a bit over 5 years away as a continuing education coordinator for public health workforce development and training. 

    You know things are bad since I'm blogging again, although they were & are not bad with either of my jobs since 2019. It's very clear to me I've been called to help in both for the past 6 years of unprecedented times. Now it's also time to move from shock to storytelling to start documenting them.

    On November 15 last year I had a horrible and quite visceral gut feeling about the direction we were headed in. Sure enough it's manifested into reality, just a few examples from last week include RFK Jr. sent Congress 'medical disinformation' to defend COVID change and having to honestly ask Can you still trust the US government’s vaccine recommendations?  

    I stand in solidarity with National Institutes of Health (NIH) staff and last week's Bethesda Declaration and may have accidentally signed it twice. Please take the time to read the gut-wrenching Shattered Science: The Research Lost as Trump Targets NIH Funding

    As of today the entire NIH-grant funded Network of the National Library of Medicine (NNLM) hasn't received FY25 funding (source), which should have begun on May 1. I'm thankful for the Alt NNLM YouTube channel and will watch for more alt resources - especially equity resources like the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion guide.  

    The health information field is fortunate to have Hilda Bastian asking hard questions like What if We Can't Rely on PubMed? early (February 14). It was thanks to her thoughtful coverage last month of Germany's Plan for an Open and Independent PubMed Safety Net that I went to their English webinar last week, and encourage checking out ZB MED's Open Life Science Publication (OLSPub) database project information.   

    I still have hope for both NNLM and my previous job's Public Health Training Center Network, which is Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA)-grant funded, as their FY25 begins July 1. I have to hope. The consequences of losing these colleagues and the vast amount of work they've done for decades creating resources to support continuing education in their respective fields is unfathomable to me.

    Monday, December 21, 2009

    Soaring onward

    2009-2016 was a good run, archived & mostly navigable of http://eagledawg.net, my new home at that time

    If you're already subscribed via RSS nothing should change for your feedreader after I transfer it Tuesday morning to the new domain. I'm not 100% sure if that's the case for email though.

    I look forward to continuing the journey with you there!

    Reflection
    My first post on March 22, 2008 was entitled A New Flight. This was after I had graduated from the University of North Texas with a Master of Science in Information Science, but I was still employed in payroll & human resources and not a Real Librarian yet.

    Let's see some of what I had to say:

    I still don't think of myself as a 'real' blogger because, for the time being, I don't have practical deep and profound brain things inside my head about the medical library profession since I'm not actually in it yet. I'm full of theory as any new graduate who is considered young by our profession's standards should be, but old enough to keep quiet and observe for now without expounding in public.

    I didn't do a very good job about that keeping quiet part or expounding in public part for very long did I?

    I'll likely continue to not do a good job at that and, quite honestly, I still don't think of myself as a 'real' blogger. I like investigating things and talking about them, and there's still so much to explore in the new year and decade ahead. Onward!

    Thursday, December 17, 2009

    PubMed Alert

    Edit from about another hour ago:

    The problem with PubMed searching is resolved. The database is current as of yesterday 12/16/2009; it will be updated as soon as possible.


    **** PUBMED-ALERTS NOTICE ****

    In my inbox about an hour ago, no sign of any RSS alerts in feed reader yet

    The use of PubMed occasionally results in unexpected error messages. For example: when you search for a known pmid, you may get the message "Wrong UID 20011576". While we work to resolve this, you may not be able to use PubMed for some searching.

    **** PUBMED-ALERTS NOTICE ****

    You are receiving this message as a subscribed member of PUBMED-ALERTS, an announcement service available from the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).

    Do not reply to this message. To contact NLM, write to NLM Customer Service at custserv@nlm.nih.gov or click "Write to the Help Desk" on any PubMed screen.

    For LISTSERV commands and Frequently Asked Questions, see http://www.nlm.nih.gov/listserv/resources_assistance.html

    Tuesday, December 15, 2009

    Clinical Reader: Ooops! but not forgotten

    This is my intended final post of substance (maybe this week's Friday Foolery, we'll see) over here.

    Do Not Panic.*

    As this year and Blogger gig comes to a close there may be another ending to report as well. If you're not already familiar with the Clinical Reader saga you can see the bottom of the original post or this summary: I blogged to call out false endorsements and images weirdness, they threatened to sue me on Twitter unless I took down my post, all sorts of weirdness occurred, and librarians are a pack of rabid wolves.

    Here's what things looked like on November 28, 2009 according to Google:



    Since then, there's been this:


    Some subpages are still publicly accessible but dropping off the Google radar like flies, which still holds 'clinical reader twitter' steady as a suggested search term and has since at least September.



    Speaking of Clinical Reader Twitter, another related Twitter account has been deleted (@allan_marks) though the highly inactive @Clinical_Reader still references it as a last tweet:



    What's the scoop?

    I don't know.

    According to a comment supposedly made by Clinical Reader staff over at David Rothman's post last month about their unauthorized use of a New England Journal of Medicine video, "We’re currently in the process of being taken over by a large publisher who intends to integrate our technology into their own systems."

    If anyone sees the publisher press release about that or the latest Clinical Reader Twitter account/website incarnation, do let me know.

    Even if this strange story is now over and done, it showed us how ephemeral and difficult it is to efficiently reference and archive social media discourse. This will live on as a case study submitted by Marcus Banks as part of his chapter for a grey literature book that will be published in early 2010. I agree with Marcus' point that

    it [Twitter, Facebook, etc.] is also not meaningless, from both an evidentiary and anthropological standpoint. This is how many people are communicating today.

    QuoteURL was of great assistance in capturing deleted tweets in June yet it is already broken, TwapperKeeper and related services are helping to archive hashtags today, but what will be the WayBackMachine of social media discourse tomorrow?


    *Very soon you'll see what's in store thanks to the awesome (thanks Cynthia!) fabulous (thanks Joelle!) hard work (thanks Mel!) of, as my beloved husband put it, winning the Boobiethon. I can hardly wait to share it all with you!

    Friday, December 11, 2009

    Friday Foolery #63: Ring it


    As the bell brought in midwinter
    I waited for a sign

    A shadow of a wing

    This has always been



    The children know this,
    That she will come to them

    To them, to them


    Snow angel, snow angel, snow angel
    She'll make her way
    and she'll stay
    For a time, for a time


    -Snow Angel, Tori Amos (help yourself, it's free from Amazon)

    I had not seen nor heard the bells in the top picture for nearly, if not exactly, 20 years until last night. There are now conflicting stories between my mom & her sister (the one who sent them to me) as to their whereabouts during that time I won't get into. 'Tis the season for family drama!

    I, my mom & her sisters, and my grandpa all grew up with them being rung for Christmas. The original owner was my great-grandmother, born in Thorold Ontario (Canadian, eh? Surprise!) in the 1870s. The story is she was the only girl in town to have her own horse & sleigh, which probably used up all the 'I want a pony!' karma in the family because none of us have had horses since.

    I went poking around and realized these are properly called shaft chimes since they each have 3 clappers and are attached to the poles of the sleigh like this lady had. We all grew up calling them sleigh bells but it's not like we central Californians ever went riding around in a sleigh to know any better. We'll work on a video to share later because they sound absolutely nothing like jingle bells, more like handbells on crack that immediately get your attention.

    The International Harvester toy truck our son is playing with in the second picture also belonged to my grandpa as a boy and is another steadfast family Christmas tradition. I have no idea what the light was doing that night because the little antique Stieff teddy bear driver is not holy.

    Friday, December 4, 2009

    Friday Foolery #62: Bacon is Good for Me

    This gets a little naughty at 2:00-2:06 (and nothing that would trigger the not safe for work alarms compared to some of the crap people post on Facebook), just a warning. Otherwise this remix is obnoxiously catchy and medically compelling:



    If YouTube is blocked at work, you'd rather not risk it, or you're a vegetarian full of love and passion I also bring you the Bacon=Freedom, Lettuce=Love, Tomato=Passion scented BLT Candles.

    In my philosophic musings I asked myself what is better than a BLT? As much as I try, I can't eat a BLT at every meal and I can't grill bacon 24 hours a day. Then I asked myself: 'What is the meaning of Bacon? What is the meaning of Lettuce? What is the meaning of Tomato?' What is the meaning of life? Then the epiphany: BLT-scented votive candles! Isn't it obvious?

    Really, I'm not making this up.

    Monday, November 30, 2009

    Manhunt: Google Wave for Community (Emergency?) Communication

    What can I possibly write except that I am so sorry that 4 officers of the peace who were working on their laptops in a coffee shop just as thousands of us do daily were killed apparently because of the uniforms they wore yesterday? There are no words. My heart hurts for their families. May justice be served swiftly, safely, and very soon.

    As of tonight the suspect is still on the loose (edit: he was killed early Dec. 1st), and for most of today many in Seattle were trying to figure out what exactly was going on as the police went from one neighborhood to another to check out tips. It's not too much of a stretch to use librarian jargon, this really is information seeking behavior in an emergent stressful situation.

    How can we understand where users turn to fulfill these types of information needs? There are always the usual media sources; newspaper, television & radio in what I now think of as three forms - traditional, website & social media channels (Twitter, Facebook, etc) in addition to everyone else participating online as well in social media.

    Then things went in an interesting direction when The Seattle Times proposed this on Twitter:



    I was one of the first 25 there. It eventually ballooned up to over 500 individual Wave accounts and bots, then it appears the Wave has died & lost functionality as of this afternoon. Google Wave is only in preview mode and been pretty unwieldy once the numbers were over 100 in other waves I'm on so I can't say I'm too surprised.

    It was an interesting ride while it lasted though. These are some brief points of observation from my perspective of how it was used that may be helpful as Google Wave further develops and others consider using it as a community or emergency communication channel. I welcome additional perspectives in comments (moderated due to spamalopes), if you were there what's your take on how it was used and progressed?

    1. People initially joined and created new blips (discussion threads) asking and replying to questions.
    2. People then self-organized, still creating new blips but turning one towards the top into a type of wiki functionality with general sections and links to information.
    3. People refined the wiki functionality by adding deletes, citations, timestamps and other identifiers to the information in addition to creating new blips.
    4. People then wondered if it was ok to delete outdated/extraneous blips, decided among themselves it was since the Playback feature would record them all, and did so.

    This is a screenshot towards the end of the third stage, click to enlarge:


    Where I went librarian with an undergrad communications/journalism background was picked up as updates number 1 and 5 at Gizmodo.com's coverage of this use of Google Wave.

    The comments in Another Google Wave Use: Manhunt at TechCrunch are excellent thoughts to consider: What if people deliberately posted misleading information there? What about spam? Sure enough someone did put some rather annoying robots in the Wave and the ability to remove them is nonexistent at this point in Google Wave's development. The screenshot TechCrunch got is during the initial self-organization phase.


    My hope is this entry is close to my normal blogging. I've sustained a minor head injury tonight and like the good medical librarian I am I'm neither panicking nor diagnosing myself but I keep mentally running down the head injury symptoms checklist to see if there's anything troublesome. So far there isn't!

    Friday, November 27, 2009

    Friday Foolery #61: Give Thanks for Shopping


    Strange Floridian photographer reindeer in front of the Victoria's Secret Outlet, International Drive, Orlando

    'Nuff said.